Skip to content 
Consider a simple example.
Imagine two friends standing on a staircase.
One stands several steps above the other.
A photographer takes a picture from an angle that hides most of the staircase.
When someone later examines the image, the person standing higher may appear dramatically taller.
If the two friends move onto level ground, their apparent difference may disappear.
Nothing about their actual heights has changed.
Only the physical arrangement has changed.
The same principle applies when people stand on sloping paths, raised platforms, uneven grass, or different levels of a building.
Even a small change in elevation can affect the way people look when photographed together.
Seating introduces another variable.
A person sitting upright on a chair may appear taller than another seated person who is leaning backward.
A bench positioned on raised ground can also create a different impression from a chair on a lower surface.
The photographer’s choice of framing can make these differences more or less noticeable.
A wide photograph may clearly reveal the surrounding environment, allowing viewers to understand exactly where everyone is positioned.
A tightly cropped version may remove the visual clues needed to interpret the scene accurately.
This is one reason historical photographs can become misleading when shared without their original context.
A picture may be authentic and still create an impression that is not supported by the complete scene.
And that distinction matters far beyond royal photography.
[Original photograph 4 — retain the next original image in this position.]
Why Other Photographs of Charles and Diana Look So Different
Although the bench offers a straightforward explanation for the Balmoral image, it does not settle every question surrounding photographs of Charles and Diana.
Images from different stages of their relationship show considerable variation in their apparent heights.
In some, their heads appear almost perfectly aligned.
In others, Charles looks several inches taller.
Occasionally, Diana seems slightly taller, particularly when she is wearing elevated footwear.
These variations are not necessarily evidence of deliberate staging.
Several everyday photographic factors can account for them.
1. Footwear Can Make a Surprising Difference
One of the simplest explanations is footwear.
A pair of high heels can increase a person’s apparent height by several centimeters.
Even shoes without obvious heels may have elevated soles that change how tall someone looks.
Diana was famous for her fashion choices, and her wardrobe evolved considerably throughout her public life.
During formal events, she frequently wore elegant shoes selected to complement her clothing.
On other occasions, particularly when participating in outdoor activities or informal engagements, she wore flatter, more practical footwear.
Charles’s shoes also varied depending on the occasion.
Formal dress shoes, country footwear, and boots can differ in sole thickness.
Consequently, two people with almost identical barefoot heights may look noticeably different depending on what they are wearing.
This becomes particularly important when comparing photographs taken years apart.
A picture of Diana in heels beside Charles cannot be treated as directly equivalent to one showing her in flat shoes.
2. Posture Changes the Way Height Is Perceived
Posture is another important factor.
Standing fully upright creates a different visual impression from leaning slightly forward, bending one knee, or tilting the head.